Quebec court alarmed public by improperly using term ‘secret trial,’ Supreme Court rules

Politics·Breaking

The Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling Friday admonishing the Quebec Court of Appeal for “misguidedly” accusing a lower court of holding a secret trial when “no secret trial was held in this case.” 

‘The very concept of ‘secret trial’ does not exist in Canada,’ says top court in 9-0 decision

A building is shown in the background, with a sign that reads Supreme Court of Canada shown in the foreground.
The Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling Friday that admonished the Quebec Court of Appeal for ‘misguidedly’ accusing a lower court of holding a secret trial when ‘no secret trial was held.’  (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

The Supreme Court of Canada issued a ruling Friday admonishing the Quebec Court of Appeal for “misguidedly” accusing a lower court of holding a secret trial when “no secret trial was held in this case.” 

In a unanimous decision, all nine justices on Canada’s top court said “the very concept of ‘secret trial’ does not exist in Canada. 

“That expression could in fact have suggested that [an unnamed person] had been convicted following a secret criminal proceeding,” the ruling said. “That state of affairs alarmed the public and the media.”

“It also jeopardized public confidence in the justice system,” it said.

More to come

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Peter Zimonjic is a senior writer for CBC News. He has worked as a reporter and columnist in London, England, for the Daily Mail, Sunday Times and Daily Telegraph and in Canada for Sun Media and the Ottawa Citizen. He is the author of Into The Darkness: An Account of 7/7, published by Random House.

Corrections and clarifications|Submit a news tip|