Why this Tory beauty pageant shouldn’t bet on a David Cameron-style turnaround

Why this Tory beauty pageant shouldn’t bet on a David Cameron-style turnaround

This article is an on-site version of our Inside Politics newsletter. Subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered every weekday. If you’re not a subscriber, you can still receive the newsletter free for 30 days

Good morning from Birmingham. All four leadership contenders will address the party faithful today, in what is the last big chance any of the candidates have to change the dynamic of the race. Some thoughts on that below.

Inside Politics is edited by Georgina Quach. Read the previous edition of the newsletter here. Please send gossip, thoughts and feedback to [email protected]

Beyond the hall

There are several reasons why the Conservative party leadership election is taking such a long time. One is pure spite: some Tory MPs felt that Rishi Sunak had timed the election to get the party out of his hair before the end of the summer and were disinclined to help him. Another is that the last time the Conservatives had a long leadership election, it gave the time and the space for David Cameron to emerge.

The whole shape of this conference has been based around recreating that moment in 2005, when Cameron turned the contest on its head with a brilliant speech. That’s the lightning in a bottle that the various Q&As and hustings hosted by any number of think-tanks are trying to capture.

Thus far, that hasn’t happened. This contest remains pretty much in the same place it was at the start of the week: Robert Jenrick in the box seat, with Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly and Tom Tugendhat all fighting it out to make it to the members’ round of the contest (Tory MPs vote next week to narrow it down to a final two). It is very, very, very far down the list of important repercussions of the war in the Middle East, but one consequence of Iran’s attack on Israel is that there is, I think, very little prospect that today’s speeches will register at all outside the conference hall.

Even among political obsessives and Tory members, I just don’t think the addresses are going to get the attention and the coverage it would need to change this contest, regardless of how terrific the execution may be. There are lots of reasons for that. One is that Cameron was an incredibly talented political performer and there aren’t many politicians who could do what he did in that fateful speech in 2005. But the other, as one shadow cabinet minister put it to me last night, is that the Conservative party is not looking for a Cameron, not really. This isn’t a party that is desperate to return to office.

Yes, large numbers of Tories believe they will, thanks to Labour’s mistakes, come back to office sooner rather than later. But it does not have the same desperation to win that characterised the Tory party in 2010 or Labour in 2024. And that, as much as anything the candidates might fail to do today, is the party’s biggest problem.

Do you have questions about Modi’s third term and what lies ahead for India? Join FT, Nikkei Asia and Asia Society experts for a free webinar on October 10 and you can put them to the panel. Register here

Now try this

I had a lovely dinner at Asha’s last night, it’s well worth a visit. (There is also a sister restaurant in Manchester.)

Top stories today

  • Relocation, relocation | A growing number of business owners are considering leaving the UK over concerns that the government is planning to increase capital gains tax in the Budget this month, tax experts have warned.

  • Starmer’s Brussels wishlist | Keir Starmer will take his mission to “reset” Britain’s relations with the EU to Brussels today, but European capitals are warning that the prime minister should not expect an easy ride.

  • ‘Very, very bad’ | Kemi Badenoch has suggested that a large number of UK civil servants deserve to be in prison, in her latest controversial comments as she seeks to win the leadership of the Conservative party. Her rival Robert Jenrick was forced to defend claims that Britain’s special forces are “killing rather than capturing terrorists”.

  • Backlog ‘through the roof’ | The Home Office asylum queue stretches back almost 17 years, a Times investigation reveals. The IFS estimates that “woeful budgeting” of the Home Office asylum costs will leave a £4bn deficit in Treasury spending plans, adding to the scale of the challenge facing Labour in tackling the backlog of often complex asylum cases.

Recommended newsletters for you

US Election Countdown — Money and politics in the race for the White House. Sign up here

One Must-Read — Remarkable journalism you won’t want to miss. Sign up here