Hiatuses in the rock record are not a significant issue.
Fossils play a crucial role in piecing together evolutionary history. However, not every animal or plant is preserved as a fossil, and many fossils are lost before discovery due to the erosion of the rocks containing them. Consequently, the fossil record is riddled with gaps and is incomplete, leaving us with insufficient data to fully reconstruct the evolutionary timeline.
Now, a team of sedimentologists and stratigraphers from the Netherlands and the UK examined how this incompleteness influences the reconstruction of evolutionary history. To their surprise, they found that the incompleteness itself is actually not such a big issue. “It’s as if you are missing half of a movie. If you are missing the second half, you can’t understand the story, but if you are missing every second frame, you can still follow the plot without problems.”
“The regularity of the gaps, rather than the incompleteness itself, is what determines the reconstruction of evolutionary history,” explains Niklas Hohmann of Utrecht University’s Faculty of Geosciences, who led the study. “If a lot of data is missing, but the gaps are regular, we could still reconstruct evolutionary history without major problems, but if the gaps get too long and irregular, results are strongly biased.”
Darwin
Since Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, the incompleteness of the fossil record has been considered problematic for reconstructing evolutionary history from fossils. Darwin feared that the gradual change that his theory predicted would not be recognizable in the fossil record due to all the gaps.
“Our results show that this fear is unjustified. We have a good understanding of where the gaps are, how long they are, and what causes them. With this geological knowledge, we can reconstruct evolution hundreds of millions of years ago at an unprecedented temporal resolution,” says Niklas Hohmann.
Simulations
Computer simulations of geological processes at timescales longer than any historical records can be used to examine the effects of the incompleteness. To that end, Hohmann and his team combined simulations of different modes of evolution with depositions of carbonate strata to examine how well the mode of evolution can be recovered from fossil time series, and how test results vary between different positions in the carbonate platform and multiple stratigraphic architectures generated by different sea-level curves.
“If Darwin could read the article, he would certainly be relieved: his theory has proven robust to the vagaries of the rock record. Deep-time fossil data – however incomplete – supports our understanding of the mode and tempo of evolution.”
Reference: “Identification of the mode of evolution in incomplete carbonate successions” by Niklas Hohmann, Joël R. Koelewijn, Peter Burgess and Emilia Jarochowska, 23 August 2024, BMC Ecology and Evolution.
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02287-2